I UPLOADED IN THE FILE HOW THE ASSIGNMENT SHOULD FLOW AND ALSO THE ACCEPTABLE TOPICS FOR MY PROGRAM THAT U CAN SELECT FROM!
INSTRUCTIONS!!
This week you considered study topics deemed acceptable for your program. For this discussion, share with your peers your initial thoughts on a topic you'd like to pursue and choose one of the following for your post:
SELECT ONE OF THE OPTIONS BELOW TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE TOPIC YOU CHOOSE FROM THE LIST OF ACCEPTABLE TOPICS
- Share topics that seem to speak to the question you’re interested in answering. Are there other topics you might choose instead? How or why would you be persuaded to change your mind?
- Discuss questions other researchers have raised about your topic. How do their questions compare to yours?
- Discuss questions you have about the list of approved topics. How might you get your questions answered?
- As we wrap up this week, share a key takeaway from your program's list of approved topics that is immediately relevant to your own project.
Example of how the assignment should flow!! Discussion of the topic should begin with a topic sentence like this: "The topic for the proposed study is…" (The topic statement should not be the same as your question.) This paragraph should include descriptive sentences that provide your reader with a clear overview of the topic supported with literature from evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles. Example: The topic for the proposed study is resiliency among first-generation college students at four-year colleges. Describe resiliency, first-generation college students, and four-year colleges, supporting each description and citing that support. Having clearly named, described, and supported each element of the topic, articulate the link between your topic and the field of your program as well as your specialization. The most effective way to demonstrate your topic’s significance is to link it to the growing body of peer-reviewed literature related to your topic. A dissertation or capstone is an independent, original piece of scholarship; you want to connect your proposed work explicitly to the acceptable topics and methods for your program. Cited support is required. The problem takes the form of a miniature literature review. Often this section is best organized using subheadings for each concept, phenomenon, or variable you plan to study. This is a brief summary of important findings related to your study—it should be evident that you are well-versed in the scholarship of literature on your proposed topic. The problem is also a good place to connect the target population in a deeper way to your topic if you have not done so. The reference section should be in perfect APA style. This section should include supporting references (articles cited in your Project Plan). Most projects will have 35 or more references listed by the end of the course. Instructions Consult the Acceptable Topics and Methods and Project Plan Guide provided by your program for specific expectations for the following sections. Be sure to update the reference list as you add resources to support your project development. Use the Project Plan Template to structure your assignment as follows: Topic Describe the specific topic to be studied. Provide a brief synthesis of recent literature on the topic and clearly identify the target population, variables, and/or concepts under study. Ensure that the topic is grounded in a problem and aligned with your program of study. Example: The topic for the proposed study is the effect of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behavior among employees in health care organizations. Describe transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, and employees in health care organizations. Support and cite the support for each of these descriptions. Describe the significance of this topic to your program or field (business, counseling, education, technology, public service leadership, psychology, social work, and so on) and your specialization within your program if applicable. Correctly form the topic. Use appropriate language for key concepts/phenomena addressed by the topic. Clearly specify relationships among the foundations (quantitative method). Identify and define the specific concepts or foundations to be explored (qualitative method). Name the target population. Focus the concepts appropriately. Use scholarly literature to explain what is known and unknown about this topic. Report the actual study findings (not implications or recommendations) from recent (5–7 years from expected date of graduation), peer-reviewed articles, and seminal works to explain the current status of the topic and to show the gap in understanding that you propose to fill. Problem Write a brief statement regarding the need for the study that fully describes the problem or need being addressed. The need for the study is often referred to as the project or research problem. Correctly state the problem: Summarize existing literature and key findings. Clearly formulate gaps in the existing literature or problems in practice. Explicitly state, rather than imply, the project or research problem. State the theoretical or conceptual framework with source. In simplified terms, the project or research problem might take this form: “The scholarly literature on _________ indicates that ________ is known and __________ is known, but what is not known is ______________." Write out the problem statement and theoretical foundation. Quantitative problem statement example: "The proposed study will examine the extent to which (independent variable) influences (dependent variable) among (population) (moderated/mediated by [variable]). X Theory (citation) will serve as the theoretical framework of the proposed study." Qualitative problem statement example: "The proposed study will seek to ________ (understand, describe, develop, discover) how [concepts/theory foundations] have addressed the ________ (central phenomenon, experience/event, process) for _______ (the target population). The tenets of Y theory (citation) will serve as the conceptual framework of the proposed study." Example: "This qualitative generic inquiry study will explore how Maslow's hierarchy of needs' foundations of physiological and safety needs are associated with the perceptions of post-Covid 19 unemployed job seekers toward job hunting.
,
Last Revised 6/30/2022
Acceptable Topics and Techniques
This document outlines the theoretical orientations, topics, techniques, and populations appropriate and feasible for doctoral learner capstone projects and dissertations within the Doctor of Information Technology program. Doctor of Information Technology The Doctor of Information Technology degree program is designed for experienced professionals seeking to advance in their careers as senior technology managers, consultants, researchers, or teachers. Throughout the program, you will integrate information technology and research with practice, and develop expertise in IT, cybersecurity, and managing IT projects. Selecting a Topic for Your Doctoral Project An acceptable doctoral capstone or dissertation topic is aligned with your program, avoids significant participant risks, represents a refinement or improvement over current best practice, and is feasible. Capella University is committed to helping doctoral learners identify potential challenges related to feasibility. An important consideration for topic selection is whether it is feasible to complete the proposed doctoral capstone or dissertation within the timeframe of your degree. These challenges can add a significant amount of time to a learner’s degree completion or result in doctoral capstones or dissertations that cannot be completed. The theories, topics, and techniques acceptable and feasible for doctoral projects in the program align closely to the profession, coursework, and faculty expertise. In completing your project, you will gain a deeper understanding and mastery of a particular theoretical orientation and topic at the doctoral level. While not an exhaustive listing, the following sections detail those theories, topics, and techniques that meet the criteria for being both acceptable and feasible for doctoral projects within the program. Please work with your faculty instructor and/or mentor to ensure that your topic is appropriate for the DIT program. Projects and dissertations that lie outside the scope of the guidance provided here will need to be vetted by the Program and Research Director for further determination of relevance, rigor, and feasibility. In some cases, the Dean of the School of Business, Technology, and Health Care Administration will need to approve the topic.
Last Revised 6/30/2022
Acceptable Project Techniques Project techniques Sources of data Type of analysis Sample size (participants) Generic qualitative inquiry
Interactive, real-time interviews, with each participant interview lasting 45-60 minutes.
Thematic analysis Approximately 10-12
Quantitative Surveys (validated, peer-reviewed instruments only; learners may not create their own surveys)
Regression analysis Requires a G*Power analysis to identify appropriate sample size
Note. Called project techniques in Professional Doctorate programs but called methods and designs in the research courses and PhD programs. In very rare cases, project techniques other than those listed above may be approved by the SoBTH Program Director and Research Director. For approval, the learner must show that (1) none of the techniques listed above will adequately address the project topic, (2) they thoroughly understand the technique that they want to use, (3) they have the knowledge, skill, and resources needed to successfully use the proposed technique with minimal support, and (4) they understand and accept the potential risks, effort, costs, and delay that may accompany the use of a non-standard technique. Learners must work with their mentor to prepare their case and schedule a Zoom meeting with the SoBTH Program Director and Research Director for approval of any project technique not listed here.
Resource List on Project Techniques* Research Designs Explained (Project Techniques)
Recommended Theoretical Orientations* • Boundary object theory • Complexity theory • Critical success factors theory • Diffusion of innovations theory • General systems theory • Information processing theory • International information • Media richness theory • Process virtualization theory
systems theory • Technology acceptance model • Technology dominance theory • Unified theory of acceptance and
use of technology • Work systems theory • Behavioral decision theory • Social cognitive theory • Disruptive technology theory • Equity theory • Contingency theory • Absorptive capacity theory • Cognitive load theory • Social learning theory
Recommended Acceptable Program Topic Areas* • Corporate social networking • Information technology • Internet of Things (IOT)
infrastructure for big data • Blockchain • Artificial intelligence • Cybersecurity • Agile methods in project • Project management office • Leadership skills in project
management, including scrum approach to portfolio management management • Access control • Business continuity and disaster • Cryptography
recovery planning
Last Revised 6/30/2022
• Employee monitoring • Enterprise information systems • Information security governance security and risk management • Operations security • Social networking/privacy • Security architecture and design • Cloud Computing • International education in • Using technology to enhance
information technology learning • Using technology to support • Business intelligence and • Customer engagement and social
teaching and teaching analytics media administration
*This is not an exhaustive list. It is meant to provide thoughts on appropriate topics to pursue. Refer to current, relevant, respected professional publications and peer-reviewed journals for identification and justification of proposed topics. Avoid Significant Participant Risks All research involving human subjects involves some degree of participant risks. Even doctoral capstone projects that do not involve human subjects research as defined by the federal regulations may present risks to the individuals involved. Doctoral projects involving significant participant risks will not be approved. Carefully review Assessing Participant Risk in Research to understand how to assess potential topics for risk and mitigate risk. When selecting a doctoral capstone or dissertation topic, learners should avoid topics involving significant participant risk, including those which might be considered highly "sensitive" or involve highly vulnerable populations. Certain topics are also prohibited at Capella. Library Guides Research assistance, subject guides, and useful resources compiled by Capella librarians can be found within the Capella Library.
• Library Guides
- Resource List on Project Techniques*